About the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit

Questions regarding the use of the C++ SDK for Server or Client development or integration into customer products ...

Moderator: uasdkcpp

Post Reply
j.zhou.5q
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 04 Feb 2015, 06:39

About the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit

Post by j.zhou.5q »

Hi,

I don't quite understand the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit. So I want to confirm that my understanding is right.
In part7's Table 145 – SecurityPolicy - Basic128Rsa15,
there are four conformance units besides Security Level 1.

My understanding:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the other four conformance units(Security Basic 128Rsa15, Security Certificate Validation and so on) have been implemented,
then the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit is already implemented.(We should do nothing for "Security Level 1" specially)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it right?

I am looking forward your answer. Thank you!

Best Regards,
James

User avatar
Support Team
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 3072
Joined: 18 Mar 2011, 15:09

Re: About the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit

Post by Support Team »

Hi,

These conformance units (Security Level 1 - 3) are already removed from the specification since there was no useful mapping possible to existing security constructs in the other parts. The next specification version 1.03 does not have them anymore.

Best Regards,
Unified Automation Support Team

j.zhou.5q
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 04 Feb 2015, 06:39

Re: About the "Security Level 1" ConformanceUnit

Post by j.zhou.5q »

Hi,

Thank you very much! I got it.

Best Regards,
James
Support Team wrote:Hi,

These conformance units (Security Level 1 - 3) are already removed from the specification since there was no useful mapping possible to existing security constructs in the other parts. The next specification version 1.03 does not have them anymore.

Best Regards,
Unified Automation Support Team

Post Reply